Organisations spend $370.3 billion globally on learning and development training in 2019, but was it worth it?
Let’s consider these data first, according to several researches:
These statistics suggest that not only are the majority of training programs in today’s companies ineffective, but also the purpose, timing and content of training might be flawed.
See also: HR Learning: 2 Types of Employee Engagement State
Learning and development programmes are meant to upskill employees so that they can make a case for a promotion. By having the programmes also, employers expect their employees to perform better, thus driving better results and return on investment. Yet, flawed programmes will only result in flawed productivity. So, why do employees still perform less after training?
First: It can be that HR teams build a programmes that do not suit an employee’s role. For example, mandate a busy employee attend a training session on “business writing skills” or “conflict resolution” or some other such course with little alignment to their needs.
Second: The method does not go well with the employee’s interest, thus learning fails. German psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus pioneered experimental studies of memory, culminating with his discovery of “The Forgetting Curve”. He found that if new information is not applied, we will forget about 75 percent of it after just six days.
What should the L&D team change?
In the fast moving business landscape, it is important to adapt to changing circumstances rapidly and to always be learning. As author and Podcaster Steve Glaveski puts it, get your L&D programmes a ‘lean learning’. Lean learning is about:
Lean learning supports the adaptability that gives organisations a competitive advantage in today’s market. To apply lean learning, the team should focus on:
Read also: Virtual Work & Workforce Development to Improve Team’s Performance